SURF and Amgen Scholar Proposals
The purpose of the SURF/Amgen Scholar proposal that you are required to write and to submit is to explain to other people:
- what you plan to do in your research
- why this work is necessary or desirable
- specifically, how you will do it
- to persuade, by your preparation and by force of argument, that you are the right person for the job
The people who will read the proposal will include your mentor and the faculty evaluators who recommend funding priorities to the Student-Faculty Programs Office.
Your prospective mentor will, of course, have expert knowledge about your project, and will be best able to judge the merits of your objectives and plan of attack. The evaluators will be less well informed about the background and motivation of your research, so you will have to provide information that will help them put the details in perspective.
Ask the mentor to review and comment on your proposal. This step is critical in establishing the collaborative process. Be sure you give them ample time to do so. Your proposal may go through several revisions before it is ready to submit as part of your application.
No two proposals are alike, and there is no general recipe which, if followed to the letter, will guarantee a good proposal. Most proposals do share -- or can share -- a few common structural features, however. A good proposal will anticipate and answer questions that an informed (and somewhat skeptical) person might ask. Examples of such questions are given below each heading. These examples are not exhaustive, and are not meant to be a checklist. They are included to stimulate your thinking about the questions that you should raise and answer in your proposal that are especially pertinent to your task.
A proposal of two or three pages, carefully thought out and precisely worded, should be sufficient to make all the important points. Some excellent past proposals have been contained on a single page.
Please note, students who have participated in a Caltech SFP program before will be held to a higher standard when it comes to the thoroughness and strength of the proposal.
What is the general technical area in which you will be working? What is the problem that you are trying to solve, and how did the problem arise? Why is its solution interesting or worthwhile? What is the status of related work by the professor or group that you will be joining, and what will be the contribution or significance of your research if it is successful?
What do you aim to accomplish in your project? What will you measure, and under what conditions; or, what will you calculate, model, or simulate? What are your starting assumptions or conditions, and what will be the result or product of a successful research project? What are the criteria for success? (In other words, how will you know when you have accomplished what you set out to do?)
Specifically, how will you accomplish your objective? What will you do? What are the principal steps or milestones along the path? How long will each take? What steps promise to be the most difficult, and how will you overcome the difficulties? What equipment or other resources will you need? Which of these are inherited, and which will you have to make or procure? With what other people or groups will you be collaborating? Will completion of your project depend on results from other people in related tasks? (That question may be especially pertinent for team projects.)
Making a schedule of the principal activities and events is a good way of showing the readers that you have taken a systematic approach to planning your work.
List all pertinent papers or reports that you have consulted to prepare your proposal. Include remarks or suggestions from your prospective supervisor, from graduate students, or from other people with whom you have talked.
Proposal guidelines were developed by Dr. William M. Whitney, former Deputy Manager, Education Office, JPL